← Search

Isabelle Farrell

Chadds Ford, PA
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 17W–35L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Isabelle Farrell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
L
2026-07-28 · Doubles Divas · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eileen Bowen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-16 · No Love Lost · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kelly Suh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-21 · Doubles Divas · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Blake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-4
W
2026-05-18 · Doubles Divas · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Grace Yu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-04 · No Love Lost · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sophia Fotakos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-02 · No Love Lost · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sophia Fotakos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Tammy Gavitt / Joanne Stow
2025-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Wendy Berger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Laura Johnson / Jeannie Taylor
2025-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Brennan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-05-22 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Dean
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-05-08 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Viktoryia Varapayeva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-04 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Kanzleiter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Marita Miller / Denise O'Connor
2025-03-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Emmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
36%
9W–16L · 41.9% of games
3.0
20%
2W–8L · 40.8% of games
6.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 40.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova