← Search

Kelly Dionne Moody Parker

— year-end
54 matches · 47W–7L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Kelly Dionne Moody Parker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
W
Lorie Whitby / Linda Smith
2026-08-31 · Parker/JB/3Oaks · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Milton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · Parker/JB/3Oaks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Owen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-23 · Parker/JB/3Oaks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Tyson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-08 · Milton/JB/3Oaks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Daniel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-06-25 · Parker/JB/3Oaks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Owen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-05-14 · Poulelis Rodgers 3.5 - NC - Snowden Grove · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Evins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-13 · Parker/JB/3Oaks · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Tyson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-09 · Parker-Witherspoon/JB/RPCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brooke Burris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-04-07 · Poulelis Rodgers 3.5 - NC - Snowden Grove · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Evins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-31 · Parker/JB/3Oaks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Holt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-12 · Parker-Witherspoon/JB/RPCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mollie Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-11-09 · Poulelis/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Evins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams48 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
95.5%
21W–1L · 68.2% of games
3.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 59.7% of games
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 65.1% of games
3.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
13 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer