← Search

Gene Snowden

Louisville, KY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
69 matches · 28W–41L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Gene Snowden to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history69 matches
L
2026-08-22 · KY/LOU/THOMPSON/HOMRICH · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tom Gondoly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · KY/LOU/THOMPSON/HOMRICH · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matthew Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-26 · KY/LOU/MCCOY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristy Dugan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-25 · KY/LOU/CALDWELL/TUGGLE (40's) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Adam Norrenbrock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · KY/LOU/MCCOY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Morgan Robertson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · KY/LOU/MIKE/WOLFORD · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucas Tuggle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-09 · KY/LOU/POWERS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jae Yeon Hwang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-26 · KY/LOU/POWERS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Jevne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-19 · KY/LOU/MIKE/WOLFORD · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · KY/LOU/POWERS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Sherek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-14 · KY/LOU/MIKE/WOLFORD · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucas Tuggle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-03-01 · KY/LOU/THOMPSON/HOMMRICH · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Todd Peklenk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
45.2%
19W–23L · 53.6% of games
4.0
25%
4W–12L · 39.1% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.9% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
18 matches
#1 Singles
16%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
11 matches
#2 Singles
10%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer