← Search

Logan Hutton

— year-end
99 matches · 76W–23L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Logan Hutton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
W
2026-06-28 · Hempfield String Theory 18+ - Roeder · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-01 · Hempfield String Theory 18+ - Roeder · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · Hempfield String Theory 18+ - Roeder · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-07-15 · Hempfield - Roeder Davis · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-06-25 · Hempfield - Roeder Davis · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-05-28 · Hempfield - Roeder Davis · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2024-11-01 · RCW Zink (Downey) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with NICK DOWNEY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2024-07-19 · Hempfield Hutton 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Weitzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2024-06-30 · Hempfield Hutton 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with NICK DOWNEY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-06-23 · Hempfield - Hutton-3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with NICK DOWNEY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-06-09 · Hempfield - Hutton-3.5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2024-05-21 · Hempfield - Hutton-3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
93.3%
14W–1L · 61% of games
3.5
79.2%
19W–5L · 60.8% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
94.1%
16W–1L · 70.3% of games
6.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 62.7% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
12W–6L · 58.5% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
21 matches
#2 Singles
10%
10 matches
#1 Singles
8%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams