← Search

Emily Martin

Berwyn, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 60W–54L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Emily Martin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Super Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-22 · Martins Dam · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susie Geib
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · Martins Dam · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susie Geib
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · Super Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-08 · Super Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-24 · Super Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · Slice Girls UMLY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maggie Gaines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-04 · Slice Girls UMLY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
So Young Jang / Jane Kim
2026-06-02 · Good Manors · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathryn Boland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · Slice Girls UMLY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-21 · Slice Girls UMLY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-20 · Slice Girls UMLY · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roberta Blazejewski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 70% of games
3.0
57.9%
44W–32L · 53.9% of games
3.5
31.2%
10W–22L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
19 matches
#1 Singles
12%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert