← Search

Hope Mizzell

Columbia, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
91 matches · 73W–18L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Hope Mizzell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history91 matches
L
2026-02-10 · CTL18/BONILLA/CTFC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paige McKeown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-11-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marie Aimone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-10-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-10-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hannah Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2025-08-26 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marie Aimone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-05 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marie Aimone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2025-04-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marie Aimone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Meghan Hall / Anne Patterson
2025-03-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hannah Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-02-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blair King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-02-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marie Aimone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-02-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hannah Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
92.3%
12W–1L · 76.8% of games
3.0
82.5%
52W–11L · 63.4% of games
3.5
70%
7W–3L · 53.4% of games
6.5
40%
2W–3L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
11 matches
#1 Singles
7%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams