← Search

Erica Chavez

Lincoln, NE
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 33W–29L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Erica Chavez to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
W
2026-08-17 · Van Ostrand · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alyssa Hill Bloyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-09-22 · Van Ostrand · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kami Kassebaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2025-09-15 · Van Ostrand · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jessica Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-25 · Van Ostrand · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lisa van Ostrand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-18 · Van Ostrand · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Stephanie Hohlen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-08-06 · Sands · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lee Timan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-05 · Sands · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lee Timan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-29 · Sands · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lee Timan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
Emma Craig
2025-06-18 · Rally Renegades · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-06-11 · Rally Renegades · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-06-04 · Rally Renegades · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-21 · Rally Renegades · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 48.7% of games
3.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 58.2% of games
3.5
82.6%
19W–4L · 61% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 31.3% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 42.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
19 matches
#1 Singles
23%
14 matches
#2 Singles
21%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe