← Search

James Dickinson

Fort Collins, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 76W–28L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add James Dickinson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
W
2026-08-20 · FCCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neal McConnellogue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-06 · FCCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · FCCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dean Barber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-23 · FCCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Greg Lammons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · FCCC YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Greg Lammons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Greg Lammons championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Donald Ligrani / Steve Brown
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Kendal Sanders championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-30 · FCCC YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kendal Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-12 · FCCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dean Barber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
Christopher Bee / Christopher Jones
2026-06-09 · FCCC YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kendal Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-05 · FCCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Weller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · FCCC YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kendal Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
71.4%
15W–6L · 58.9% of games
3.5
71.4%
45W–18L · 58.7% of games
7.0
100%
8W–0L · 69.7% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
17 matches
#1 Singles
13%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert