← Search

Tara Geha

— year-end
11 matches · 2W–9L · seasons 2021–2023

Captains: add Tara Geha to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history11 matches
L
2023-07-17 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Petee/Morris-Stone Oak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenell Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2023-06-19 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Petee/Morris-Stone Oak · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-06-12 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Petee/Morris-Stone Oak · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
Amy Snyder
2023-05-22 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Petee/Morris-Stone Oak · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
Christina Hammerling / Michelle Walker
2022-07-27 · NWO 18&Over 2.5W McEwen-Stone Oak · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tracey Perkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2022-07-20 · NWO 18&Over 2.5W McEwen-Stone Oak · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michelle Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2022-06-22 · NWO 18&Over 2.5W McEwen-Stone Oak · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2021-07-13 · NWO 18&Over 2.5W Day McEwen -Stone Oak · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kristin Metzger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2021-07-06 · NWO 18&Over 2.5W Day McEwen -Stone Oak · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2021-06-22 · NWO 18&Over 2.5W Day McEwen -Stone Oak · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kristie Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2021-05-18 · NWO 18&Over 2.5W Day McEwen -Stone Oak · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kristie Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
Teams3 teams · 2021–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 46.8% of games
3.0
0%
0W–4L · 30.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
4 matches
#1 Singles
27%
3 matches
#2 Singles
18%
2 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
1 match
#3 Doubles
9%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova