← Search

Elizabeth Tschannen

Beverly Hills, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 45W–64L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Tschannen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · #4 Doubles · with Joan MANSUETI championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · DCD- Moore 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Wooddell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Jennifer Mitchell
2026-07-13 · BHC-Uhl 40s 3.0 DW F2 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-07 · DCD- Kushiner 40s 3.0 NW F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tiffany Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-07-06 · BHC-Uhl 40s 3.0 DW F2 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-06 · DCD- Moore 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · DCD- Moore 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · BHC-Moore 18s 3.5 DW F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lina E Bata
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-18 · DCD- Brueckman 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-13 · DCD- Moore 18s 3.5 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-11 · BHC-Moore 18s 3.5 DW F2 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
60%
9W–6L · 56.6% of games
3.0
46.3%
19W–22L · 49.5% of games
3.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 40.2% of games
5.0
40%
2W–3L · 60.3% of games
5.5
15.4%
2W–11L · 37.1% of games
6.0
60%
6W–4L · 57% of games
6.5
25%
3W–9L · 40.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
23 matches
#1 Singles
19%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
14 matches
#2 Singles
7%
8 matches
#3 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams