← Search

Pam Wong

Plymouth, MI
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 9W–31L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Pam Wong to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
L
2026-07-21 · NAC-Zimmerman 65s 6.0 DW · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jan Hankins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-26 · NAC-Zimmerman 65s 6.0 DW · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Herritage
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-12 · NAC-Zimmerman 65s 6.0 DW · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jan Hankins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-29 · NAC-Zimmerman 65s 6.0 DW · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jan Hankins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-08-08 · 3NAC-ZIMMERMAN 60DW FRI 65&O SEM · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathy Foust
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-07-25 · 3NAC-ZIMMERMAN 60DW FRI 65&O SEM · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jan Hankins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-11 · 3NAC-ZIMMERMAN 60DW FRI 65&O SEM · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jan Hankins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-08-02 · 1NAC-ZIMMERMAN AD65&O FRI 60 WOMEN SEM · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jan Hankins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2024-06-14 · 1NAC-ZIMMERMAN AD65&O FRI 60 WOMEN SEM · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jan Hankins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2023-07-28 · 3NAC-ZIMMERMAN AD65&O 60W FRI SEM · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jan Hankins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2023-07-26 · 2NAC-ZIMMERMAN AD55&O 60DW WED SEM F1 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Herritage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2023-07-24 · 3SCWB-LOVY AD18&O 25NW MO SEM F6 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Vandana Katamaneni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
25%
4W–12L · 38.7% of games
6.0
18.2%
4W–18L · 38% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova