← Search

Colleen Tate

Akron, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 45W–39L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Colleen Tate to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-07-18 · X18 6.0 TP1 Dean · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christopher Peters mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · A18 3.0W PCC Innes · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
Mary Chlebina / Marnie Walston
2026-07-14 · A18 3.0W PCC Innes · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Bransyn Mathia
2026-07-08 · A18 3.0W PCC Innes · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-24 · A18 3.0W PCC Innes · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vicki Mercer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · A40 3.5W PCC Innes · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · A18 3.0W PCC Innes · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Kimmell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-07 · X18 6.0 TP1 Dean · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christopher Peters mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-03 · A18 3.0W PCC Innes · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Akhtar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-05-27 · A18 3.0W PCC Innes · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-05-20 · A18 3.0W PCC Innes · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-13 · A18 3.0W PCC Innes · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
61.9%
13W–8L · 55% of games
3.0
55.1%
27W–22L · 52.2% of games
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 37% of games
5.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.6% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 54% of the time
#1 Singles
54%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
12 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer