← Search

JESSICA SKIDMORE

IDAHO FALLS, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 20W–26L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add JESSICA SKIDMORE to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
W
2026-08-18 · Smart Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lexie Kerby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-10 · Smart Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lexie Kerby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-28 · Smart Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hailey Ball
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-22 · Smart Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kodi Howell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Tina Taylor championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Tina Taylor championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · with Tina Taylor championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · Hailey Ball · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tina Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-23 · Hailey Ball · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-19 · Hailey Ball · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-16 · Hailey Ball · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katilyn Onkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 62.6% of games
3.5
21.4%
6W–22L · 38.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
6 matches
#2 Singles
13%
6 matches
#1 Singles
11%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer