← Search

Katie Buehler

— year-end
88 matches · 63W–25L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Katie Buehler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history88 matches
W
Kristen Jones / Becca Decker
2026-09-08 · Gardner/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tessa Powers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-03 · Johnson/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Liz Mcclain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-25 · Gardner/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Wetherington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · Smead/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adonis Mendoza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-18 · Smead/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Arnsdorff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-08 · Smead/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Keck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-27 · Smead/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Keck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-14 · Gardner/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amber McGhee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-13 · Gardner/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amber McGhee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-05-07 · Gardner/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amber McGhee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-06 · Gardner/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amber McGhee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-30 · Gardner/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amber McGhee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Teams43 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
75%
21W–7L · 64.4% of games
3.5
64.9%
24W–13L · 56.5% of games
6.5
77.8%
14W–4L · 63.9% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
25 matches
#1 Singles
6%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert