← Search

Chris Ashman

Tulsa, OK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 34W–33L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Chris Ashman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
W
2026-08-10 · Blue 1/Evans/SH/tri 4.0M · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Matthew Bristow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · Blue 1/Evans/SH/tri 4.0M · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Trey Barrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-08 · Bristow/SH 3.5M · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-20 · Bristow/SH 3.5M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larry Birch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-04 · Bristow/SH 3.5M · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-16 · Bristow/SH 3.5M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larry Birch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-04-08 · Bristow/SH 3.5M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexandre Frasco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-31 · Bristow/SH 3.5M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexandre Frasco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-11-17 · Bristow/SH 3.5M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with WIlliam Woodring
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-11-12 · Bristow/SH 3.5M · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with WIlliam Woodring
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-10-28 · Bristow/SH 3.5M · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with WIlliam Woodring
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-10-20 · Bristow/SH 3.5M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beau Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 63% of games
3.5
58.3%
21W–15L · 53.2% of games
4.0
26.3%
5W–14L · 42.5% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.2% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
16 matches
#2 Singles
10%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams