← Search

Sandra Sweet

— year-end
146 matches · 93W–53L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Sandra Sweet to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history146 matches
W
Tori Rodenbeck
2026-07-28 · NIN FW 18&O 3.5 W: WW Mey · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-20 · NIN FW 40&O 3.5 W: WW Otis/Mey · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Markley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-09 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Plemich · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
Jamie Rinkenberger
2026-07-07 · NIN FW 18&O 3.5 W: WW Mey · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · NIN FW 40&O 3.5 W: WW Otis/Mey · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Mey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Plemich · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-29 · NIN FW 40&O 3.5 W: WW Otis/Mey · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-23 · NIN FW 18&O 3.5 W: WW Mey · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Amy Krahn / Jamie Rinkenberger
2026-06-22 · NIN FW 40&O 3.5 W: WW Otis/Mey · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Markley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · NIN FW 40&O 3.5 W: WW Otis/Mey · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Markley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Plemich · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Dormeier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-10 · NIN FW 18&O 3.5 W: WW Mey · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Teams8 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
73.9%
17W–6L · 64.3% of games
3.5
66%
33W–17L · 57.2% of games
4.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 40.7% of games
5.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 46.2% of games
6.5
70%
7W–3L · 59.4% of games
7.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 60.5% of games
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 65% of games
7.0mixed
63.6%
14W–8L · 57.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 24% of the time
#2 Doubles
24%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
34 matches
#1 Singles
23%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
24 matches
#2 Singles
12%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King