← Search

Lindsey Teets

Littleton, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 48W–59L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Lindsey Teets to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
W
2026-08-17 · BM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenna Huelskamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-03 · BM GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-27 · BM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenna Huelskamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-07-23 · BM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenna Huelskamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-13 · BM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Theresa Fry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · BM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Lessmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-22 · BM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Theresa Fry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-06-17 · BM TEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Neha Sitole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-10 · BM TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenna Huelskamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-08 · BM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nina Sasaki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-03 · BM TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenna Huelskamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-01 · BM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Lessmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 49% of games
2.5
47.4%
18W–20L · 52.2% of games
3.0
44.1%
26W–33L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
34 matches
#1 Singles
20%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
6%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova