← Search

Greg Engstrom

Little Rock, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 26W–25L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Greg Engstrom to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
L
2026-09-03 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with James Bryant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-27 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Pate
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-05-12 · Lair/Weldon/LR/Rebs · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Polk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
Robert Lee / Kirk Grynwald
2026-05-07 · Lair/Weldon/LR/Rebs · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edward Angtuaco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-4
W
James Ritchie / Ryan Fitzgerald
2026-04-22 · Kibbey/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with George Rainey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-14 · Lair/Weldon/LR/Rebs · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edward Angtuaco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-04-10 · Sisco/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brice Sisco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-07 · Sisco/LR/Rebs · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joshua de la Cruz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-02 · Kibbey/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Thomas Dobry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-15 · Kibbey/LR/Rebs · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-15 · Sisco/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeffrey Fratesi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-12-22 · Morshedi/LR/Rebs · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
64%
16W–9L · 59.2% of games
3.5
25%
3W–9L · 42.1% of games
6.5
60%
6W–4L · 51.6% of games
3.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
7 matches
#1 Singles
14%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
6 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert