← Search

Jessica Gore

Lexington, SC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 63W–19L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jessica Gore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
W
2026-08-27 · LATA18/Heaberlin/LCTC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Melissa Brightbill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-08-24 · LATA40/Gore/SSP · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lauren Tolcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-12 · CTL40/Haskell/CTC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stacy Lyons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-03 · LATA40/Gore/SSP · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kerry Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · LATA18/Heaberlin/LCTC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Megan Freiburger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-29 · LATA18/Gore/LCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kacey Rugg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-10 · LATA18/Gore/LCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Teri Grote
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-10 · CTL40/Webb/CTFC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Boone Walker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-09 · CTL18/Meyers/CTFC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Corey Garrity mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-05-20 · LATA18/Gore/LCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kacey Rugg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · CTL40/Webb/CTFC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Charles Webb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-25 · CTL (A) 4.5W 40 & Over (Haskell) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Teri Grote
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 82.2% of games
3.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 75.7% of games
4.0
92.6%
25W–2L · 67.5% of games
4.5
68.4%
13W–6L · 57.6% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 58.6% of games
4.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 48.4% of games
4.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
18 matches
#1 Singles
20%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
12 matches
#2 Singles
9%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams