← Search

Adam Herstig

CARMEL, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 39W–6L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Adam Herstig to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
W
2026-08-27 · Low Tri M IRCD Copeland · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Zach Richardson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
Steven Brown / Keith Pringle
2026-08-20 · Low Tri M IRCD Copeland · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephen Short
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-23 · Indy A18 4.0M CRC Husmann · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
Jason Hostetler / John M Bradshaw
2026-07-14 · Indy A40 4.0M CRC Nelson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Frohardt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-07 · Indy A40 4.0M CRC Nelson · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
Matt Tran
2026-06-25 · Indy A18 4.0M CRC Husmann · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · Indy A40 4.0M CRC Nelson · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · Indy A18 4.0M CRC Husmann · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
Travis Tetrault
2026-06-09 · Indy A40 4.0M CRC Nelson · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-06 · Indy A18 4.0M CRC Husmann · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · Indy A40 4.0M CRC Nelson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Kupinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · Indy A40 4.0M CRC Nelson · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
86.7%
26W–4L · 60.2% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 60% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 42% of the time
#1 Singles
42%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
11 matches
#2 Singles
16%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams