← Search

Kayla Gosz

MILWAUKEE, WI
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 40W–12L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Kayla Gosz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
L
Emily Eiten / Molly Hudson
2026-07-24 · FCCC SILVER · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kaylyn Shelby
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
Teri Ouar / Darcy Peters
2026-07-17 · FCCC SILVER · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kaylyn Shelby
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
Sarah Duty / Darcy Peters
2026-06-19 · FCCC SILVER · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Kennedy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
Jennifer Schnell
2024-08-26 · FCCC RED · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-08-05 · FCCC RED · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Amy Cawrse
2024-07-22 · FCCC RED · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
Aubrey Woodard
2024-05-30 · FCCC WHITE · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2024-05-23 · FCCC WHITE · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Aubrey Woodard
2024-04-25 · FCCC WHITE · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Angela Brown
2024-04-18 · FCCC WHITE · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
Christina Kent
2023-06-23 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2023-05-25 · CSU GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 69.6% of games
3.0
78.6%
22W–6L · 64% of games
3.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 60.1% of games
6.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 50% of the time
#1 Singles
50%
26 matches
#2 Singles
17%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
8 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
8%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
6%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal