← Search

Kara Gansmann

— year-end
60 matches · 22W–38L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Kara Gansmann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Russell/McCain 5.5/18+ · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Emily Mautz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
Neerja Amin / Jennifer Wright
2026-09-08 · Russell/McCain 5.5/18+ · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Emily Mautz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-09-08 · Russell/McCain 6.5/40+ · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth McKinley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-03 · Russell/McCain 5.5/40+ · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jennifer Preston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-02 · Branco/Sullivan · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lee Garner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · Russell/McCain 6.5/40+ · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shannon Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-31 · Branco/Sullivan · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lee Garner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · Russell/McCain 5.5/18+ · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with YAEL UZIEL
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-23 · Russell/McCain 6.5/40+ · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rebecca Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-18 · Branco/Sullivan · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · Feeney 40+ · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joseph Uebbing mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-15 · Feeney 18+ · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dale Benson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
Teams51 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
42.3%
11W–15L · 48.8% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
50%
5W–5L · 47.6% of games
6.5
25%
3W–9L · 43.4% of games
3.0mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 39.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
11 matches
#1 Singles
10%
6 matches
#3 Singles
8%
5 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer