← Search

Jiwon Paik

Fitchburg, WI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
262 matches · 131W–131L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jiwon Paik to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history262 matches
W
2026-08-17 · WI Combo 7.5W MALT Balistreri · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Esra Alagoz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
Jean Bachmann / Marina Derevjago-Schiegg
2026-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Rachel Warrick championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
Mary Smith / Tracy Reese
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Rachel Warrick championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · #4 Doubles · with Rachel Warrick championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Lauren Lindley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-03 · WI Combo 7.5W MALT Balistreri · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Lindley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-24 · WI Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 Atwood · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Craig Atwood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-23 · WI Adult 18&O 4.0W MALT Lee · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Lindley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-19 · WI Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 Atwood · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Craig Atwood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
N/A
2026-07-18 · WI Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 Atwood · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ted Balistreri mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-14 · WI Adult 18&O 3.5W MALT Quinn · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aneta Kosturova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-19 · WI Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 Atwood · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with R Rama Chandran mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
66.7%
26W–13L · 59.4% of games
3.5
37.3%
22W–37L · 46.9% of games
4.0
40%
12W–18L · 48.8% of games
6.5
54.5%
18W–15L · 51.7% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 58.2% of games
8.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 38.2% of games
6.0mixed
78.9%
15W–4L · 61.2% of games
6.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 68.7% of games
7.0mixed
35.5%
11W–20L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
99 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
89 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
70 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer