← Search

Stephanie Walzer

Salt Lake City, UT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 85W–44L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Walzer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
W
2026-08-28 · Trophy Wives · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Tate Allwardt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-08-21 · Trophy Wives · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Eliott Moreno mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · Buttcaps · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Remi Barron mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
Abigail Riitters
2026-08-08 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Mary Katayama
2026-08-08 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Bob Huppert / Erica Kain
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · with Brandon Khoune championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
Shawn Farnell / Andrea Wallace
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Brandon Khoune championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Kolby Silim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Kolby Silim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
Victor Do / Delaney Canning
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Kolby Silim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-26 · Buttcaps · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Quinn Pritchett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 39.8% of games
4.0
88.6%
31W–4L · 66.5% of games
4.5
71%
22W–9L · 54.7% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 45.4% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 56.7% of games
9.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 56.2% of games
9.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 29% of the time
#1 Singles
29%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
17 matches
#2 Singles
7%
9 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer