← Search

Julia Matthews

— year-end
72 matches · 46W–26L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Julia Matthews to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Dalziel · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donna Barksdale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Cynthia Fennel / Heather Young
2026-08-27 · Dalziel · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tonya Shelton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-06 · Dalziel · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tonya Shelton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-28 · SH - Mitchell Dalziel · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Casey McKean
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Heather Young / Lee Renfroe
2026-07-27 · SH - Mitchell Dalziel · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Casey McKean
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Heather Young / Lauren Buckner
2026-06-29 · SH - Mitchell Dalziel · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Heather Fleming
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · SH - Mitchell Dalziel · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Casey McKean
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · SH - Mitchell Dalziel · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Heather Fleming
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
Jana Melton / Heather Young
2026-06-08 · SH - Mitchell Dalziel · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Casey McKean
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-04-08 · Matthews · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-06 · Matthews · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-01 · Matthews 4.0 18+ · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Teams42 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
94.1%
16W–1L · 64.6% of games
3.5
80%
24W–6L · 63.2% of games
4.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 35.9% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.3% of games
4.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 29% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
12 matches
#1 Singles
10%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer