← Search

Chad Dey

ROSWELL, GA
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
10 matches · 5W–5L · seasons 2021–2024

Captains: add Chad Dey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history10 matches
L
2023-07-13 · Dekalb TC (Jordan Haverly)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Seth Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2023-07-09 · Dekalb TC (Jordan Haverly)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Seth Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2023-06-27 · Dekalb TC (Jordan Haverly)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
Jason Thompson / Mauhaun Taheri
2023-06-17 · Dekalb TC (Jordan Haverly)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Michael Fusco / Luis Rivera
2023-06-11 · Dekalb TC (Jordan Haverly)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2021-01-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Grant Newsome
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 6-4
W
Mario Vivarelli / Thai Truong
2021-01-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Grant Newsome
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Kevin McGonigle / Brad Brown
2020-12-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Grant Newsome
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Jason Jarrells / Jere Smith
2020-12-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Grant Newsome
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2020-11-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Patton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 61.8% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 39.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer