← Search

Effie Hoffman

Great Falls, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
103 matches · 60W–43L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Effie Hoffman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history103 matches
L
2026-06-05 · Team 6 Great Falls Aces · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Tsai mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-3
W
2026-05-09 · Team 9 Forty Racquets · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Overman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-05-08 · Team 6 Great Falls Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bennett Stackhouse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-02 · Team 9 Forty Racquets · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Brock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-5
L
2026-04-24 · Team 6 Great Falls Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Oliver Arend mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
Sadie Simpson / Erin McVeigh
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · with Marcy Busch championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-17 · #3 Doubles · with Marcy Busch championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-15 · Team 8 Mad Ranchers 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with SHANE MURRAY mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-4
L
2026-04-12 · Team 6 Great Falls Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Douglas Levy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-03-30 · Team 8 Mad Ranchers 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ben Jackson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-18 · Team 6 Double Trouble · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marguerite McFadden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-03-17 · Friedman- Arctic Crush · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eleanor McManus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 46.8% of games
3.0
48.6%
17W–18L · 52.3% of games
3.5
69%
20W–9L · 55.4% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 60.2% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.2% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
14 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova