← Search

Meg Lohr

— year-end
69 matches · 55W–14L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Meg Lohr to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history69 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Team 12 Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-11 · Team 14 Samuel Grand/Roos-Oliver W4.0F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Oliver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-22 · Team 6 Sarah Sparling 8.5W · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alexandra Northington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-21 · Team 6 Sarah Sparling 8.5W · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alexandra Northington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-20 · Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-09 · Samuell Grand/Roos-Oliver W4.0T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rochelle Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-09 · Samuell Grand/Roos-Oliver W4.0T · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-30 · Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tricia Roos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-23 · Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-05-16 · Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-14 · Samuell Grand/Roos-Oliver W4.0T · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-0
Teams50 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
85%
51W–9L · 65.3% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 23% of the time
#2 Doubles
23%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
14 matches
#1 Singles
20%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
14 matches
#2 Singles
14%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert