← Search

Cindi Katz

Charleston, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 40W–20L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Cindi Katz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-06-26 · LCTA40/Facello-Katz/Maybank · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Justin McInnis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-06-17 · LCTA18/Sweet-Stribling/Maybank · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Kelso mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-10 · LCTA40/Facello-Katz/Maybank · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Kelso mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-08 · LCTA18/Sweet-Stribling/Maybank · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Sweet mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-03 · LCTA40/Facello-Katz/Maybank · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Kelso mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-27 · LCTA40/Facello-Katz/Maybank · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Justin McInnis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-20 · LCTA40/Facello-Katz/Maybank · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Kelso mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-18 · LCTA18/Sweet-Stribling/Maybank · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Sweet mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-03 · LCTA18/Stribling/Maybank · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-03-25 · LCTA18/Stribling/Maybank · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie McCabe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-18 · LCTA18/Stribling/Maybank · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jodi George
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-02-04 · LCTA18/Stribling/Maybank · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 70.3% of games
3.0
57.1%
12W–9L · 52.8% of games
3.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 31.4% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
87.5%
14W–2L · 65% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#2 Singles
13%
8 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova