← Search

Hayley Pratt

HOLLADAY, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 58W–46L · seasons 2020–2025

Captains: add Hayley Pratt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
L
2025-12-06 · Liberty Park-Tieff · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-08 · Liberty Park-Tieff · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Hampton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-3
W
2025-09-26 · #3 Doubles · with Cole Paterson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-20 · Liberty Park-Tieff · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Regan Tieff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-09-19 · Utah/Patrick/ITAMixed8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cole Paterson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-09-13 · Liberty Park-Tieff · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Krysia Leason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2025-08-22 · Utah/Patrick/ITAMixed8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cole Paterson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Charli Franco championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Hampton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charli Franco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Cronin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-05-09 · Eccles-Patrick · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Riding mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
57.9%
11W–8L · 51.4% of games
4.0
50%
21W–21L · 48.5% of games
4.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 37.7% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 60.2% of games
7.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 72.6% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 45.6% of games
8.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
29 matches
#1 Female Doubles
6%
6 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches
#2 Female Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King