← Search

Courtney Newell

Little Rock, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 48W–26L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Courtney Newell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
W
2026-09-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jaclyn Bracey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · Jedlicka/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with LoisAnn Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-14 · Jedlicka/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffani Jedlicka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6
L
2026-08-03 · Jedlicka/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Quilao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-27 · Cortright/Bryant/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Royce Ford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · Jedlicka/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Baptist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · Cortright/Bryant/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Royce Ford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-13 · Jedlicka/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with LoisAnn Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-29 · Pinter/LR/BP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamey Rough mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
William Hancock / Madeline Donahue
2026-06-18 · Pinter/LR/BP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick O'Keefe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-17 · Cortright/Bryant/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Royce Ford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-09 · Pinter/LR/BP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick O'Keefe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 65.4% of games
4.0
80%
24W–6L · 59.5% of games
4.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.5% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 53.4% of games
7.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.9% of games
8.5
25%
1W–3L · 34.2% of games
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 50.9% of games
4.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
22 matches
#1 Singles
18%
13 matches
#2 Singles
11%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert