← Search

Danielle Weiss

New City, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 62W–44L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Danielle Weiss to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history106 matches
W
2026-09-10 · WTC: 3.5 Ace Ace Baby! · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Chuebon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · with Michele Bond championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
Carolyn Stanyek / Lori Bennett
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · with Michele Bond championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · with Sheryl Salerno championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-21 · Double Trouble · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-15 · Bergen:Iron Swing · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristy Yeaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-30 · Double Trouble · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-24 · Bergen:Iron Swing · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Bond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-19 · Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Reimers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-17 · Bergen:Iron Swing · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyle Healy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggi Maksoud
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-06-12 · Double Trouble · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aleksandra Szymanski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
82.2%
37W–8L · 58.9% of games
3.5
39.1%
18W–28L · 46% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 21.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
21 matches
#1 Singles
13%
14 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer