← Search

Jackson Dozier

Greenville, SC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 34W–17L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jackson Dozier to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
L
2026-09-02 · UPTA18C/Gray/Kroc · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Eli Herrnstadt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-22 · UPTA18C/Gray/Kroc · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Matthew Jacques
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-28 · UPTA18M/Beckerle/HollyTree · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Austin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · UPTA18TL/Gray/Kroc · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Seth Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
Stephen Brown / Kimey Kyker
2026-06-21 · UPTA18M/Beckerle/HollyTree · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sara Hudgens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · UPTA18TL/Gray/Kroc · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Austin DuBois
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · UPTA18TL/Gray/Kroc · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Seth Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-3
L
2026-05-24 · UPTA18M/Beckerle/HollyTree · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Danielle Beckerle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
Stephen Brown / Duncan Hogg
2026-05-02 · UPTA18A/Gray/Kroc · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Jacques
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-18 · UPTA18A/Gray/Kroc · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hunter Gray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-11 · UPTA18A/Gray/Kroc · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Jacques
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-03-28 · UPTA18A/Gray/Kroc · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Jacques
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 57.4% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
100%
7W–0L · 66.7% of games
4.5
50%
7W–7L · 52.9% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
50%
3W–3L · 51.8% of games
4.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 78.2% of games
4.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#1 Singles
10%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova