← Search

Caroline Withers

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 55W–29L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Caroline Withers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
W
2026-09-07 · MKleber/LGrant (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leigh Corso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-03 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Leigh Corso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-21 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Marshall Wyker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-17 · MKleber/LGrant (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sara Lineberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-14 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Leigh Corso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-11 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katie Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-08-10 · MKleber/LGrant (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leigh Corso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · with Marshall Wyker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-15 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-04 · MKleber (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan McKeever
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-01 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Moss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-04-20 · MKleber (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50%
10W–10L · 53.5% of games
4.0
90%
18W–2L · 65.5% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 66.2% of games
7.5
59.1%
13W–9L · 57.5% of games
8.5
50%
2W–2L · 54.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
21 matches
#1 Singles
11%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer