← Search

Marianne Miceli

Park City, UT
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 17W–45L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Marianne Miceli to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
L
2026-07-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janna Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-06 · PC Perry · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacey Christrensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-04 · PC Perry · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cynthia Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-01 · Park City Mid Court Crises · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Moran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-05-28 · PC Perry · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laura Osborne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-11 · Park City Mid Court Crises · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janna Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-04-27 · Park City Mid Court Crises · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Holloway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-28 · Park City MARC-Midcourt Crisis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheri Jacobs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-14 · Park City MARC-Midcourt Crisis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kari Collier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-13 · Park City Mid Court Crisis-Jacobs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacey Christrensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-2
W
2025-12-11 · Park City Mid Court Crisis-Jacobs · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kari Collier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-09-13 · Mid Court Crisis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheri Jacobs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
34.2%
13W–25L · 43.9% of games
3.0
26.7%
4W–11L · 38.3% of games
6.0
0%
0W–8L · 28.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 63% of the time
#2 Doubles
63%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
6 matches
#2 Female Doubles
8%
5 matches
#1 Female Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal