← Search

GRIFFIN STANTON-AMEISEN

Brooklyn, NY
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 47W–25L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add GRIFFIN STANTON-AMEISEN to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
W
2026-08-04 · Tang · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stephanie Gerst mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-07-22 · Tang · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Anna Tang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-20 · #2 Doubles · with Michael Trainer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-13 · #2 Doubles · with Matthew Sachs championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-08 · Choy · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Lomelin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-07 · Choy · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Andy Dong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-31 · Choy · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Geoffrey Brennan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7
L
2026-05-26 · Choy · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kyle Arnold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-17 · Choy · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Sachs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-09 · Choy · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Trainer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · Choy · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Trainer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-17 · Bindler · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Misner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 66.7% of games
4.0
80%
20W–5L · 57.9% of games
4.5
57.1%
12W–9L · 54.5% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
25 matches
#1 Singles
15%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
8 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal