← Search

Amanda Bergen

Ridgefield, CT
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
65 matches · 33W–32L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Amanda Bergen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-05-30 · 4S:Summer Vibes:Buono · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Lucas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-05-03 · 4S:Summer Vibes:Buono · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Chapple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-12 · 4S:Shore Shots:Buono · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-05 · 4S:Shore Shots:Buono · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-03-01 · 4S:Good Vibes:Ortiz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eva Ortiz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-02-08 · 4S:Good Vibes:Ortiz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth van Den Nieuwenhuizen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-6
W
2026-01-24 · 4S:Good Vibes:Ortiz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hillary Salo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-01-08 · 4S:Shore Shots:Buono · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-04 · 4S:Good Vibes:Ortiz · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-12-11 · 4S:Shore Shots:Buono · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sivan Kerins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-12-07 · 4S:Good Vibes:Ortiz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hillary Salo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-11-09 · 4S:Good Vibes:Ortiz · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
53.6%
15W–13L · 52.8% of games
3.5
46.7%
14W–16L · 48.3% of games
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 32% of the time
#1 Singles
32%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer