← Search

Amber Bowling

Louisville, KY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
93 matches · 62W–31L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Amber Bowling to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history93 matches
W
2026-08-25 · KY/LOU/UNDERHILL/BOWLING · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
Anne Offutt / Anita Frayser
2026-07-28 · KY/LOU/HAWKINS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cara Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-28 · KY/LOU/UNDERHILL/BOWLING · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-07-21 · KY/LOU/HAWKINS · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Butler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · KY/LOU/HAWKINS · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Louisa Lewandowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-06-23 · KY/LOU/HAWKINS · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lee Harring
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · KY/LOU/DAHLEM/OCONNELL · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · KY/LOU/HAWKINS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Butler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-10 · KY/LOU/HAWKINS · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · KY/LOU/DAHLEM/OCONNELL · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-04-25 · KY/LOU/HAWKINS · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-04-12 · KY/LOU/DAHLEM/OCONNELL · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
85.7%
18W–3L · 66.2% of games
3.5
71.2%
37W–15L · 58.5% of games
4.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 37.3% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 47% of the time
#1 Singles
47%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
12 matches
#2 Singles
13%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
9 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova