← Search

Zach Rowles

Durham, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
168 matches · 107W–61L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Zach Rowles to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history168 matches
L
2026-09-02 · ZRowles-DUR · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Matthew Feldt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-01 · ROakley.6.5C-EV · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Aaron Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-19 · ZRowles-DUR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Keith Buckel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-11 · ROakley.6.5C-EV · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Aaron Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-09 · ROakley.6.5C-EV · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lee Goldberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-30 · SGraff.40.3.5M-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Graff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-16 · SGraff.40.3.5M-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Isaacs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-29 · AYoung-EV · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · SGraff.40.3.5M-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Schmitz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-15 · AYoung-EV · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-11 · SGraff.40.3.5M-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Regina Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-04 · SGraff.40.3.5M-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with MaryJo McNeill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
75%
36W–12L · 62.2% of games
3.5
52.4%
22W–20L · 51.4% of games
5.5
100%
5W–0L · 68.9% of games
6.5
52.9%
18W–16L · 52.8% of games
3.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 74.2% of games
3.5mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 38.4% of games
6.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 61.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 28% of the time
#3 Doubles
28%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
40 matches
#2 Singles
15%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
24 matches
#1 Singles
12%
20 matches
#3 Singles
7%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova