← Search

Jennifer Tripoli

Madison, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 34W–46L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Tripoli to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Britt, Virginia · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Demeka Harrington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-27 · Hodges, Martha · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Monique Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-26 · Crowder, Jeanna · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wendi Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-26 · Britt, Virginia · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Anna Lucovich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-20 · Hodges, Martha · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Monique Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-12 · Britt, Virginia · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amy Parr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-23 · Turpin, Leahbeth · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Leahbeth Turpin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-18 · Turpin, Leahbeth · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michelle McCarty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
Bailey Brown / Jennifer Richardson
2026-06-09 · Turpin, Leahbeth · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mary Wilsford Hodges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-26 · Smith, Nathan · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kurt Black mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-19 · Smith, Nathan · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-12 · Turpin, Leahbeth · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mary Wilsford Hodges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 59.7% of games
3.0
36.8%
14W–24L · 45.1% of games
5.5
60%
9W–6L · 52.3% of games
6.5
20%
1W–4L · 28.9% of games
3.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 25.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
15 matches
#3 Singles
6%
5 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe