← Search

Anna Winfield

Austin, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
192 matches · 105W–87L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Anna Winfield to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history192 matches
W
2026-08-13 · We Thought This Was Brunch · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judy Daffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-06 · We Thought This Was Brunch · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Veruna Stanescu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-05 · We Thought This Was Brunch · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Veruna Stanescu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-30 · We Thought This Was Brunch · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Veruna Stanescu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-07-23 · We Thought This Was Brunch · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Foley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · Love Means Nothing · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shannon Spurgeon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · Love Means Nothing · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tom Patton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-09 · We Thought This Was Brunch · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Veruna Stanescu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · Love Means Nothing · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tom Patton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-27 · Love ‘em and Leave ‘em 3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-19 · Love ‘em and Leave ‘em 3.5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-18 · Serve Me a Double · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Hay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
54.2%
39W–33L · 53.4% of games
3.5
38.5%
20W–32L · 45.8% of games
6.0mixed
73.1%
38W–14L · 56.9% of games
7.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
47 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
10 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer