← Search

Lea Brandt

— year-end
58 matches · 35W–23L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Lea Brandt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
W
2026-08-04 · JD Vail · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tyler Helton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
Chelsea Burns / John Augustine
2026-07-30 · April Edwards · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kamlendra Singh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-28 · JD Vail · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mihail Popescu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-21 · JD Vail · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with JD Vail mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-21 · JD Vail · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Delali Kwame Buatsi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-01 · Kathy Hodges · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hsinyeh Hsieh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-24 · Kathy Hodges · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hsinyeh Hsieh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-22 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-22 · Stephanie Womack · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Kleffner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Everett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · Stephanie Womack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Evelien Rietveld
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-03 · Kathy Hodges · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Vogt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Teams16 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
66.7%
22W–11L · 61.8% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
12W–6L · 57.8% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
11 matches
#1 Singles
7%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams