← Search

Amy Twardowski

Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 69W–36L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Amy Twardowski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
W
2026-08-24 · DTP BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robyn Frahm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-08-17 · DTP BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adeline Singer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-03 · DTP BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · DTP TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-10 · DTP TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-29 · DTP TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Bravo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-22 · DTP TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-15 · DTP TEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-28 · DTP NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with KRISTEN ALIX
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-11 · DTP NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chelsea Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-20 · DTP NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-13 · DTP NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Shrensky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
62%
49W–30L · 56.1% of games
6.0mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 66.8% of games
6.5mixed
90%
9W–1L · 61.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
14 matches
#1 Singles
12%
13 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert