← Search

Gabrielle Bohdel

BOISE, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
112 matches · 70W–42L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Gabrielle Bohdel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history112 matches
W
2026-09-03 · VAMOS · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ted Wagner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-27 · VAMOS · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ted Wagner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-20 · VAMOS · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ted Wagner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-26 · G Bohdel · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-22 · G Bohdel · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-22 · Causing a Racquet · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaime Butler-dawson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-18 · YOURS! · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-16 · YOURS! · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Francel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-15 · Causing a Racquet · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaime Butler-dawson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-14 · G Bohdel · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-13 · G Bohdel · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · YOURS! · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 62.7% of games
3.0
65.7%
44W–23L · 56.1% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 40.2% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 67.1% of games
6.5mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.8% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 28% of the time
#1 Singles
28%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
16 matches
#2 Singles
9%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer