← Search

Jennifer Cleek

Ponte Vedra Beach, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 52W–20L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Cleek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
L
2026-08-30 · PVIC - Cleek · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sheila Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-22 · PVIC - Cleek · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Paul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · PVIC - Cleek · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathy DeJesus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · PVIC - Cleek · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Freeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-29 · PVIC - Cleek · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Freeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-28 · PVIC - Cleek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Walling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · PVIC - Cleek · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sheila Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-27 · PVIC - Cleek · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · PVIC - Cleek · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-12 · PVIC - Saig · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Grant Gainer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · PVIC - Cleek · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Legout
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · PVIC - Egan · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jacqueline Bell Egan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
79.4%
27W–7L · 59.1% of games
7.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 56.7% of games
8.5
75%
9W–3L · 61.5% of games
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#1 Singles
11%
8 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams