← Search

Daniel Rivera

Austin, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 41W–18L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Daniel Rivera to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
L
2026-06-21 · Tasteful Tweeners · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-31 · Tasteful Tweeners · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-19 · Tasteful Tweeners · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-16 · Volley Ranchers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edana de la Torre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-13 · Volley Ranchers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edana de la Torre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-03-22 · Fireballers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ruth Hjelmeland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-03-22 · Volley Ranchers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edana de la Torre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-02-22 · Fireballers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Hoang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-11-11 · Tasteful Tweeners · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-11-02 · Tasteful Tweeners · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-10-26 · Tasteful Tweeners · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-09-28 · Tasteful Tweeners · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Fraley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
79.2%
19W–5L · 59.1% of games
4.0
50%
9W–9L · 48.7% of games
7.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 58.2% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 27% of the time
#1 Singles
27%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
13 matches
#2 Singles
19%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams