← Search

Mimi Conjar

— year-end
31 matches · 19W–12L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Mimi Conjar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Dearman/Thomas/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Laura Wilson / Anjali Lewis
2026-09-04 · Shalk/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christina Egan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-19 · Dearman/Thomas/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sara Gibbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Dearman/Thomas/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-07 · Shalk/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christy Briggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-31 · Shalk/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Cole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-06 · Brown/Rosenthal/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-22 · Brown/Rosenthal/Nashville · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-06 · Hambidge/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maryam Khan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-03-26 · Hambidge/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shalini Rose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-03-18 · Brown/Rosenthal/Nashville · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-04 · Brown/Rosenthal/Nashville · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Teams29 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 55.1% of games
7.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 55% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
7 matches
#1 Singles
19%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
6 matches
#2 Singles
10%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova