← Search

B Patrick Schaffer

Windsor, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 19W–34L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add B Patrick Schaffer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
W
2026-07-02 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sara Schaffer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-01 · MLF ORANGE · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-30 · MLF ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Curtis Tesdahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-28 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sara Schaffer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-17 · MLF ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rick Merlino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-10 · TAG ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Tomlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · TAG ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rob Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-24 · MLF BLACK · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-20 · MLF BLACK · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with DaeGon Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-20 · TAG ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Louis Anich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-05-17 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sara Schaffer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
John Shaw / Vigan Bajraktari
2026-05-13 · MLF BLACK · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Curtis Tesdahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 49.5% of games
3.5
6.7%
1W–14L · 35.1% of games
6.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.6% of games
6.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
9 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert