← Search

Greg Puklicz

Irving, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 20W–31L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Greg Puklicz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
W
Troy Hanson / James Robertson
2026-09-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-0
L
Jorge Elgueta / Phillip Klumper
2026-08-22 · Team 1 Greg Puklicz 6.5M · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bruce Vanderbush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Huck Hibberd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tad Deupree
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Huck Hibberd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-11 · The Nelson/Puklicz M7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Huck Hibberd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-01-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Huck Hibberd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-11-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Taffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2025-11-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-11-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Taffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Taffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Taffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
45.5%
10W–12L · 49.4% of games
3.5
38.1%
8W–13L · 45.1% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
13 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova