← Search

David Romness

Richardson, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 35W–21L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add David Romness to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
W
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chad Stansell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Rafael Fields / Crystopher Echavarria
2026-08-23 · Team 3 Doug Hipskind 6.5M · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joel Guinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-22 · Team 3 Doug Hipskind 6.5M · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Doug Hipskind
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
Eric Milhizer / David Thomas
2026-08-21 · Team 3 Doug Hipskind 6.5M · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Doug Hipskind
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chad Stansell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Hansmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph DeFina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Hansmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-31 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Hansmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Snitker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Snitker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
75.7%
28W–9L · 61.5% of games
3.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 44% of games
6.5
20%
1W–4L · 38.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
6 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova